derisively-intellectual mets chatter

October 29, 2004

Mets Want Manny or Sammy


According to Newsday, the Mets are having internal discussions about acquiring either World Series MVP Manny Ramirez or fading superstar Sammy Sosa. Both would cost around $20 million per year, with Manny having four years left and Sammy, after a trade, having two guaranteed years plus a buyout. This is apparently an example of new GM Omar Minaya "thinking outside the box".

This has to be a joke. If the Mets are willing to pay upwards of $20 million per season for a player, why would they settle for Sammy Sosa? Manny will be 33 next May, and is still one of the best players in the game, but is useless in the field (save that throw home in Game 3 of the Series). Why would they even comprehend spending that kind of money on a player with known deficiencies when they could have this guy? He's not perfect: his average could be higher, and I hear he ties his shoes funny.

Here's another bit of bad news/good news from the article:
In yet another example of outside-the-box thinking, the Mets are for the first time willing to entertain offers for prized young shortstop Jose Reyes. There has been speculation regarding a Reyes-for-Alfonso Soriano deal, but the Mets won't consider that because Soriano will make $8 million in arbitration.
Here's my own attempt at outside the box thinking: why don't the Mets hold on to the players that actually don't suck and work at getting rid of those that do, big time. Is Sammy Sosa really worth taking back even if it means unloading Cliff Floyd?

Talk amongst yourselves. I need some aspirin.


Comments

i'm always reminded of the late ralph wiley's line, "the paper comes out every day," when i read stuff like this. the series is over. the hot stove doesn't heat up until next month... you get the point. i'm not putting much stock in sosa rumors since minaya's history, as far as i know, does not include any prior bouts of complete insanity.

manny ramirez is less insane as a plan B. it's not a smart plan B, just not complete insanity under the right conditions. namely, if boston gets hot and heavy for beltran, and consequently is willing to eat some -- try a LOT -- of manny's contract, we *might* have something to talk about. of course theo epstein has no prior history of insanity either. so hopefully this rumor will soon be put to rest.

Posted by: dave - October 29, 2004 at 10:35 AM EST

Trading Reyes for Soriano is outside the box thinking? I hope they get back in that damn box then. Am I the only one who can envision them doing that trade and then Soriano demanding to play secondbase so that we have to move Matsui back to shortstop? just kidding, hopefully

Posted by: Hojo4Life - October 29, 2004 at 11:10 AM EST

According to the "article", the Mets would NOT trade Reyes for Soriano because of Soriano's salary.

Posted by: Eric Simon - October 29, 2004 at 11:20 AM EST

Do what I do. Just pretend that you did not read the articles. Unreal, you cannot make that stuff up. I have no problems with Manny, but he is after the Mets fail to land Magglio, Beltran, or Drew. If and only if they cannot get a slugger in for of those three or even Sexson should they consider Manny. What I cannot comprehend is if they are willing to spend 20mill on Manny, who not throw that 20m per year at Beltran. If you are willing to spend that much on one player, do it right. I by no means think they should spend 20M on a player, but if they are, do it right.

Posted by: Mike - October 29, 2004 at 11:35 AM EST

Duh, thinking "outside-the-box" means paying a lot of money for really famous players with declining skills. Never before have the Mets tried such a strategy. With all the other teams in the major leagues trying to corner the market on young, talented, afforable players, the Mets will have this market all to themselves. In addition, such old declining players will fit right in with dried out, bagged out, slunk meat like Tom Glavine and Al Leiter.

In other "outside-the-box" moves, the Mets will be resigning Johnny "Two Thumbs" Franco, picking up Richard Hidalgo's option and smearing every seat at Shea Staduim with feces.

Posted by: Duder - October 29, 2004 at 11:54 AM EST

So 'Outside the Box' thinking is trading for overpaid, aging, suspected cheating OF who's numbers are falling?!

'Outside the box' thinking: if they picked up Manny on waivers LAST year. Now that he won WSMVP they want him! Well then 29 other teams are outside the box and there's noone inside!

Posted by: Nick - October 29, 2004 at 12:23 PM EST

Man, I'm absolutely with you on this one. How can they make things even worse than they are?

Posted by: Attila - October 29, 2004 at 01:37 PM EST

Calvin Pickering was once a top prospect of the Baltimore Orioles before injuries derailed his ascension to Major League stardom. When he’s been healthy, however, Pickering has done nothing but hit in the majors and minors and brings tremendous. Here’s a rundown of Pickering’s key stats that jump out at me:

Lifetime numbers in the Majors (with Balt., Boston, Cinci, and KC): 123 games, 359 at bats, 20 homers, 18 doubles, 58 walks, 119 strikeouts, .340 OBP, .465 SLG, .228 ISO, .237 batting avg.

For the Omaha Royals in 2004: 89 games played, 299 at bats, 35 homers, 12 doubles, 70 walks, 85 strikeouts, .451 OBP, .712 SLG, .398 ISO, .314 batting avg.

Comparing 2004 winshares, Pickering 4 in 35 games. Sosa 14 in 126 games.

2002 and 2003 were essentially lost years for Pickering due to injury, but before that, Pickering put up solid 20 and 30 homerun years in the minors with OBP in the .330s. He strikes me as an over the hill prospect whose lost his chance and won’t get one again anytime soon. He’s lost on the KC bench- 3rd string 1b behind Mike Sweeney and Ken Harvey. But, he is 6’5” and 270 lbs. and all power. But unlike many pure power hitters, he has shown patience at the plate (lifetime majors OBP of .340).

If the Mets are indeed looking for a bat and not trying to blow up their payroll, Calvin Pickering might be a nice, cheap alternative to Sammy Sosa. Sosa is scheduled to earn roughly $17 mill next season and $35 mill over the next 2 years guaranteed, which would utterly stifle the Mets payroll until 2007. Pickering plays for roughly $300k.

Posted by: Gene - October 29, 2004 at 02:08 PM EST

I could see picking up Pickering if the Mets needed a designated hitter, though he might have some use as a pinch hitter coming off the bench. He has very good peripheral offensive numbers, but he has no running speed and has zero range at first base. The Mets have no use for him as a full-time first baseman.

That said, he would be a great bat off the bench to be paid the league minimum.

Posted by: Eric Simon - October 29, 2004 at 03:01 PM EST

just a thought on comparing winshares and salaries in the 2004 season for 1b free agents:

free agents:
========================
sosa: 14 WS($17 mill)
carlos delgado: 17 WS ($19.7 mill)
richie sexson: 3 WS (90 ABs) ($8.75 mill)
jt snow: 20 WS ($1.5 mill)
calvin pickering: 4 WS (Sept. callup) (MLB minimum)
* not actually a free agent, but could easily be acquired for low level talent in exchange

current mets:
eric valent: 6 WS (mlb minimum)
jason phillips: 5 WS (mlb minimum)
cliff floyd: 14 WS ($6.5 mill)
mike piazza: 12 WS ($16 mill)

strikes me that $20 mill for sammy would be a horrible investment (even if the cubs eat floyd and pay part of sammy's salary). Sammy and Floyd have the same aggregate # of winshares in 2004 (14) and don't project too differently for '05... at which point Floyd's contract finally expires, while Sammy is signed through '06.

the combo of valent/phillips/pickering could produce similar net winshares to sammy or delgado over a season and jt snow produced 6 more net winshares than the former cubbie star at 1/10th the contract price and 3 more net winshares than even delgado.

all this being said, i know winshares are not a good predictor of future succes, but are a good metric for past performance.

Posted by: Gene - October 29, 2004 at 03:35 PM EST

I agree, Eric -- Pickering doesn't quite make sense for the Mets. They wouldn't be giving him first or an outfield slot, and I think he's wasted as an occasional PH. Would be good for an AL team looking for a DH on the cheap.

My thoughts on Sosa are here -

http://eastcoastagony.weblogs.us/archives/021149.html

My conclusion is that the Cubs would have to throw an absurd, impossible amount of money our way to make it worthwhile. I'm not putting too much credence in the rumor myself, but it doesn't hurt too mull it over.

Posted by: ECA Mike - October 29, 2004 at 04:49 PM EST

My comments on this are up on AA but my day today has just been a nightmare because of that article.

I feel like it's July 30th all over again, I hear the Kazmir rumor, dismiss it thinking "Ah, they'll never do something that stupid." and then, before you know it, BAM! It's done, can't be undone.

I'm so angry and depressed. It's SSDD. If Reyes isn't the starting shortstop on opening day next year (for any reason other than injury), I swear I'll boycott Shea. Seriously.

Posted by: Jay - October 29, 2004 at 05:20 PM EST

I'm with you, Jay. Black Friday made _anything_ possible.

Posted by: ECA Mike - October 29, 2004 at 08:27 PM EST

I'm supposed to act suprised, right?

Posted by: Matt - October 30, 2004 at 01:46 AM EST

All three rumors are just that....rumors started by a press core that needs to sell papers. As for reality:

Manny: No way do the Red Sox trade the MVP of their 86 year curse busting world series title.

Reyes: Omar will not trade Reyes for anyone not named Hudson, or Johan Santana. The former is a joke, the later is nore serious. The Twins will lose their SS, and very likely will lose Santana next year as an FA. They would love a guy like Reyes, who could step in for Guzman, and be locked up on the cheap for several years.

Sosa: Scary, but if the Mets can get the Cubs to eat a good portion of his deal I could see Omar doing this. Do I want it no happen...well let me use to letters to describe my feelings....NO.
I could ammend that to NO WAY ON HELL, but that would be piling on.

Posted by: nemetfan - October 30, 2004 at 08:49 AM EST

Yeah, if the Cubs eat $19MM of the $20MM it might make some sense. If Sammy comes, why not give Mo another shot.

Posted by: Fahrenheit 7/30 - October 30, 2004 at 11:39 PM EST

Would it be *completely* out of the question to bring in someone under 30? Or am I nuts for even proposing it?
A thought-- Cleveland's got a logjam at 1B/DH with Hafner, Broussard, and Phelps, and Mike Aubrey coming up quickly. Any of the three would probably outhit any free agent 1B out there, save Sexson.

Posted by: pancakes - November 1, 2004 at 02:21 AM EST

obviously, you mean phelps, who can't field, or broussard. hafner ain't going anywhere. honestly, all talk of these veterans makes me feel sick. can we please, please rebuild. if brazell or valent play first next year, i don't mind. our lineup especially sucked this year because matsui, reyes, piazza all were DL'd simultaneously in July and August, crucial time to have the team together.

since we ARE rebuilding and will not consistently be good for a few years, all Sosa's, Delgado's, even Magglio's, should be left out of the conversation. We are NOT a win now team - we come in last or second to last and finish under .500 every year.

Posted by: MikeinSpain - November 1, 2004 at 10:16 AM EST

SABERMETS INFO







SPONSORS


what's this?
CALENDAR

August 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
SEARCH

BOOKS

Currently Reading:

Rob Bradford: Chasing Steinbrenner
Chasing Steinbrenner
Rob Bradford

Jeff Pearlman: The Bad Guys Won
The Bad Guys Won
Jeff Pearlman

Baseball Prospectus 2004
Baseball Prospectus 2004


Lawrence S. Ritter: The Glory of Their Times
The Glory of Their Times
Lawrence S. Ritter

On Deck:

Bill James: Whatever Happened to the Hall of Fame
Whatever Happened to the Hall of Fame
Bill James

Just Finished:

Jim Bouton: Ball Four
Ball Four
Jim Bouton

Pete Rose: My Prison Without Bars
My Prison Without Bars
Pete Rose
METS NEWS

ARCHIVES

RECENT ENTRIES

RECENT COMMENTS

Slammin' Sammy at Shea (9)
Peter wrote: Stanton is on the Yankees...What th...[more]

Spring Training Open Thread (5)
John E wrote: I agree with the injury concerns an...[more]

This Is Me Talking (5)
a2d wrote: I think we all came off well. I was...[more]

Bloggy McBloggerson (2)
bronxmetfan wrote: What is going on with Ayer Soler (t...[more]

Mientkiewicz or Lee (8)
m2c2c2 wrote: This was my least favorite move of ...[more]

METS INFO

METS IN PRINT

METS BLOGS

OTHER BASEBALL BLOGS

BASEBALL WEBSITES

BASEBALL COLUMNISTS

MLB PLAYER INDEX

TOOLS FOR FOOLS

REQUIRED READING

Goodbye To Some Old Baseball Ideas
Branch Rickey

Pitching And Defense
Voros McCracken

Pitching And Defense
Tom Tippett

The Sabermetric Manifesto
David Grabiner

Transaction Primer
Rob Neyer

Rule V Draft Explanation
Baseball America

... in progress ...
CREDITS

Powered by
Movable Type 2.661

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.