Mets Want Manny or Sammy
According to
Newsday, the Mets are having internal discussions about acquiring either World Series MVP
Manny Ramirez or fading superstar
Sammy Sosa. Both would cost around $20 million per year, with Manny having four years left and Sammy, after a trade, having two guaranteed years plus a buyout. This is apparently an example of new GM
Omar Minaya "thinking outside the box".
This has to be a joke. If the Mets are willing to pay upwards of $20 million per season for a player, why would they settle for Sammy Sosa? Manny will be 33 next May, and is still one of the best players in the game, but is useless in the field (save that throw home in Game 3 of the Series). Why would they even comprehend spending that kind of money on a player with known deficiencies when they could have
this guy? He's not perfect: his average could be higher, and I hear he ties his shoes funny.
Here's another bit of bad news/good news from the article:
In yet another example of outside-the-box thinking, the Mets are for the first time willing to entertain offers for prized young shortstop Jose Reyes. There has been speculation regarding a Reyes-for-Alfonso Soriano deal, but the Mets won't consider that because Soriano will make $8 million in arbitration.
Here's my own attempt at outside the box thinking: why don't the Mets hold on to the players that actually don't suck and work at getting rid of those that do, big time. Is Sammy Sosa really worth taking back even if it means unloading
Cliff Floyd?
Talk amongst yourselves. I need some aspirin.